The Oxford University Undergraduate Law Blog

Welcome to the Oxford University Undergraduate Law Blog (OUULB).

As part of the Oxford University Undergraduate Law Journal (OUULJ), the Blog serves as the flagship undergraduate hub for discussing contemporary developments in the law — independently edited and staffed by Oxford students.

Back to Faculty of Law Blogs

23 November 2025

Old Chestnuts, New Problems: A Comment on Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley

by: Wong Yi Xuan

10 November 2025

Criminalising Speech or Civilising Debate? The Global Divide in Defamation Law

by: Olivia McConnell

26 October 2025

Empowered but Exposed: Section 6 and the Fragility of the UK’s Post-Brexit Constitution

by: Haseeb Haraj

26 June 2025

Vicarious Liability Hits a Dead End Down Under: Australia Confines Liability to Employment Relationships in Bird v DP (a pseudonym) [2024] HCA 41

by: Shivanii Arun

17 April 2025

40 Years On from Street v Mountford: The Decision and its Impact

by: Geng Heqin

18 February 2025

Should Generative AI Have a Significant Effect on Questions of Liability in the Law of Tort?

by: Oh Ming Song

24 January 2025

(In)appropriate Steps: HRA Damages in BS v Scottish Ministers

by: Wong Yi Xuan

10 December 2024

Haters Gonna (Sue the) Tate: Court-Based Class Warfare and Private Nuisance post-Fearn

by: Marlon Austin

22 June 2024

Deconstructing Dworkin's 'One-Right-Answer' Thesis

by: Kian Jepson

21 January 2024

Case Comment: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority

by: Bertie Broomfield

15 October 2023

'Is the Secretary of State entitled, under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from receiving Royal Assent?' [Scottish Government: Runner-Up]

by: Beatrice Munro

15 October 2023

'Is the Secretary of State entitled, under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from receiving Royal Assent?' [UK Government: Winner]

by: Wong Yi Xuan

30 July 2023

'Is the Secretary of State entitled, under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from receiving Royal Assent?' [Scottish Government: Winner]

by: Fionn McFadden

1 July 2023

No ‘Exceptional’ Test for Vicarious Liability in Sexual Abuse Cases: A Welcome Conclusion by the Supreme Court in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB

by: Athena Kam

3 May 2023

Implied Terms in the Supreme Court: Barton v Morris and another in place of Gwyn-Jones

by: Somesh Taori

The Oxford University Undergraduate Law Blog

Old Chestnuts, New Problems: A Comment on Tindall v Chief Constable of Thames Valley

Criminalising Speech or Civilising Debate? The Global Divide in Defamation Law

Empowered but Exposed: Section 6 and the Fragility of the UK’s Post-Brexit Constitution

Vicarious Liability Hits a Dead End Down Under: Australia Confines Liability to Employment Relationships in Bird v DP (a pseudonym) [2024] HCA 41

40 Years On from Street v Mountford: The Decision and its Impact

Should Generative AI Have a Significant Effect on Questions of Liability in the Law of Tort?

(In)appropriate Steps: HRA Damages in BS v Scottish Ministers

Haters Gonna (Sue the) Tate: Court-Based Class Warfare and Private Nuisance post-Fearn

Deconstructing Dworkin's 'One-Right-Answer' Thesis

Case Comment: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority

'Is the Secretary of State entitled, under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from receiving Royal Assent?' [Scottish Government: Runner-Up]

'Is the Secretary of State entitled, under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from receiving Royal Assent?' [UK Government: Winner]

'Is the Secretary of State entitled, under Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998, to block the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from receiving Royal Assent?' [Scottish Government: Winner]

No ‘Exceptional’ Test for Vicarious Liability in Sexual Abuse Cases: A Welcome Conclusion by the Supreme Court in Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses v BXB

Implied Terms in the Supreme Court: Barton v Morris and another in place of Gwyn-Jones

Connect with us: